Category Archives: Uncategorized

So I opened up Word 2007, and I went to type a bulleted list, and I went to indent the second item using the ‘tab’ key…

and it didn’t happen.

Grr.

But there is a solution. I Googled the problem and found the answer at http://help.wugnet.com/office/Turning-automatic-paragraph-indent-Word-2007-ftopict1065762.html. It turns out that during my work yesterday, I turned off “Set first- and something- indent using tab key” setting in ‘AutoFormat As You Type’. Huh.

This program is so complex it drives me nuts sometimes. I played with the idea of switching to WordPad for my writing, but WordPad can’t do multi-level lists. I might as well use Notepad. So I have to choose between “useless” and “over-the-top” when it comes to functionality. Grr.

  • Side-scrolling shooter
  • Flash
  • Keyboard controls (the only downside to the whole game :D )

Why I like it

Shooting!

Power-ups! Big guns!

Massive circular saw!

Blueshift - circular saw weapon - awesome

Blueshift - circular saw weapon - awesome

Creative array of evil mechanic enemies!

I wear a suit and tie to work every day. This is despite the lenient dress code at my office. Last Friday I left the tie at home for “casual Friday” – I felt uncomfortable.

Strangely enough, in my particular office there is even pressure to dress down. From time to time, people will make jokes about me being “uptight” or “needing to relax”, or they will comment on how they would never wear a suit to work unless they needed to.

So the “conformist” thing to do would be to dress down.

However I feel that the suit and tie are a better reflection of who I am. I am a professional, not a slob.

And this strategy has paid dividends.

1. Whether right or wrong, people judge me on first impressions. So when an outsider appears in my team, they think that I must be more intelligent and professional than the rest.

2. Because I feel confident, empowered and comfortable with who I am, I can be more persuasive when speaking. And I sit up straight and work harder, because I feel good.

3. The others tend to dress up for special occasions – e.g. when a big executive comes to visit, or for a job interview. But they look uncomfortable in their once-in-a-blue-moon tie – meanwhile I look “in my element”. And it works on interviewers, visitors and clients.

Conforming or rebelling
Dressing well is not about buying $800 designer jackets, the latest colours and changing your hairstyle every time Beckham does. To me, that kind of over-the-top fashion is bullshit.

I mean really, how can you justify spending $400 on a pair of jeans, when it was manufactured by a labourer earning $4 a day? With 60 cents of raw materials? With some bastard businessman or snobby “artist” pocketing millions of dollars for simply being arrogant?

“High fashion” is about conforming. But really, wouldn’t you rather be yourself?

What matters to me is simply dressing well. Clean shirts. Pants without holes in the knees. Brush your teeth, comb your hair, shower every day. That’s not rebellious, that’s just healthy and polite.

In social situations, people get the impression that you’re safe and pleasant to be around. In business situations, people get the impression that you can be trusted to do a good job.

A $1,200 handbag just tells them that you need to buy expensive things to prop up your weak ego. And you are incapable of holding your own set of principles – thus you need the Fashion Channel to tell you how to dress. Plus, that particular bag is SO yesterday, so mission failed. Conforming with the ever-shifting demands of Fashion is a pretty intense task. Few people can keep up without hiring a professional to do it for them.

Dress well, that’s all.

Is a practical understanding enough? Are fundamental “first principles” necessary?

My company has a lot of processing jobs. People know how the systems work and how to get their jobs done – practical knowledge.

But they lack “bottom-up” “first principles”-type understanding. They don’t know all the features of the software, they just know the buttons that get their specific job done. They don’t know how people tick, they just know which buttons to push with their manager to get what they want.

If you give them a new computer system, or a new manager, or a new process… or change any part of their job… they will be lost and require weeks of re-training.

What does this analogy show us?

They can’t readily apply what they know to related tasks, because they only know very specific things, not general principles.

Bottom-up acquisition gives people fundamental understanding, so that they can work effectively in a broad range of tasks.

Let’s apply this to computer programming, since that’s relevant and familiar.

Suppose you learn to write BASIC. You only learn BASIC. You read a stack of books on BASIC. You’re an expert BASIC programmer, in a company which sells software written in BASIC. Are you any good to any other company as a “programmer”? No, you’re just a BASIC hacker with a narrow skill set.

That’s the problem with top-down learning.

References:

Never Read Passively: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Acqusition of Principles

Attention data is an entirely different species to user-created content. One is owned by service providers, the other is owned by users.

Some of the posts about data portability have strayed from talking about user-created content, the central pillar of Web 2.0. Now they’re talking about attention data, and some people are claiming that users have the right to control access to their attention data. This all pollutes the question of whether “data portability” is good.

User-created content includes photos and blog entries. It was created by the user, and the right to publish, export or retract that content should remain with the user. You should have every right in the world to revoke Facebook’s licence to store it. It is unfortunate when opportunistic “terms of service” steal this copyright from you.

Attention data, on the other hand, was created by the service provider. It is just a log file, created by Facebook/Amazon/shops/banks. It is equivalent to the file notes that financial institutions keep on each customer’s file. It is equivalent to the emails that sales staff in business-to-business companies send to each other internally.

It is data about you, but it is not data that you created. It’s not your property. So what if it’s based on observing you?

The attention data is rightfully owned by the business that put the effort into generating it. Thus you have no right to tell Facebook/Amazon/etc that they can’t have it any more. You also can’t instruct them to disclose it to a third party.

I think data portability, especially in the sense that dataportability.org use it, is about freeing user-created content from service provider lock-in.

So implement data portability and set user-created content free. Everyone benefits from data portability.

Anyone who works for the Government has to quit their job if they want to run for election. Bugger.

Commonwealth public servants are lucky when it comes to standing for Parliament. They’re generally covered by a policy to hand them their old job back if they don’t win the election.

It’s a hassle for everybody else though.

And the basis for the rule is what? So that members of Parliament, whilst in power, don’t have a conflict of interest. Jeremy’s suggestion on Joshua Gans’ blog, of letting such candidates quit their jobs after winning the election is quite a good solution. The persons would not have any time being under such a conflict of interest.

The Constitutions’s section 44, which prohibits persons under an office of profit from entering Parliament, is the blocker. It disqualifies persons from being “chosen or sitting as” a member. Maybe if our High Court feels like bending the rules a bit (i.e. any day of the week), we could have them “interpret” that to mean that a public servant can quit just as (or just before) being announced as the winner in their seat.

Alternatively, “interpret” that a teacher on unpaid leave is not in an office of profit at that particular time.

How else can we sort out this technicality that just makes things hard for people?

Zhanzuo.com have such a silly drop in traffic in late August? Well, I’m no expert on Chinese culture or web surfing patterns, but I can draw a few inferences from an Alexa graph. 56.com is another website funded by Sequoia Capital, which is the capital behind Zhanzuo. Look at its drop:

Read More »